main
md 58 lines 2.13 KB
Rendered Raw
1 # 2024-03-21
2
3 Attendees: hexa, vcunat, Linus, zimbatm, Eelco, Janik, raitobezariusm, Alex
4
5 ## Round table
6
7 - zimbatm
8 - had no spoons to think about cache
9 - vcunat
10 - expensive nixos tests that could be improved
11 - noticed `nixos-disk-image.drv` steps taking a long time in send/receive
12 phase
13 - hexa
14 - unhappy with the board decision to let Anduril sponsor, like delroth. At an
15 impass. We need to find a way to work on this together.
16 - not sure if delroth is ultimately out.
17 - don't want to burn out if delroth is gone.
18 - I also don't want to invest time, when the org agrees to military
19 sponsorship.
20 - Next step: get to the policy, connect with delroth to see if we can keep
21 working on it together or not.
22 - Janik
23 - opened issue after the open board calls about meeting infrastructure.
24 https://github.com/NixOS/infra/issues/401
25 - PR with Jitsi probably soon.
26 - Do we have a database for the pads?
27 - hexa: should be colocated with the machine.
28 - Jonas: do we have hardware for this?
29 - hexa: we can try it on caliban. If it grows too big we can move it.
30 - Linus
31 - happy to review what Janik is doing.
32 - happy to pair with anyone
33 - Eelco
34 - what the plan with the self-hosting?
35 - still in discussion, we intend to a do some exploration with Ceph
36 - we still need to find a way to pay for the cache.
37 - Alex Ou
38 - NixCon NA attendee.
39 - Interested in infrastructure, their main use of NixOS, managing bare-metal
40 fleet of servers
41 - Raitobezarius
42 - Concerned with the state of the infra, due to delroth ragequitting.
43 - Tigris Data: CDN+S3 built on top of fly.io that migth be interested in
44 sponsoring us.
45 - Meeting with PCH.org: have hundreds of datacenters, they can offer
46 everything in terms of storage infra.
47 - Lots of POPs
48 - Storage
49 - ...
50 - Proposition in progress.
51 - Would like to update the set of people in the infra core for inactive
52 people, in order to be able to reason on who has access, so we can reason
53 about trust.
54 - Eelco?
55 - Graham?
56 - Amine?
57 - Proposal: remove access, and restore if needed
58 - Eelco agreed. (Actually Eelco needs to reconsider.)