@matheusbsbs / matheus-bagliano / commits / 228e7b5d4d
Fork 0

status: list unmerged files much later

When resolving a conflicted merge, two lists in the status output need more attention from the user than other parts. - the list of updated paths is useful to review the amount of changes the merge brings in (the user cannot do much about them other than reviewing, though); and - the list of unmerged paths needs the most attention from the user; the user needs to resolve them in order to proceed. Since the output of git status does not by default go through the pager, the early parts of the output can scroll away at the top. It is better to put the more important information near the bottom. During a merge, local changes that are not in the index are minimum, and you should keep the untracked list small in any case, so moving the unmerged list from the top of the output to immediately after the list of updated paths would give us the optimum layout. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Johannes Sixt committed Sep 1, 2009 at 22:13 UTC 228e7b5d4d6eca8616c7dc3d979478909dbdbfd1
1 file changed +1 -1
wt-status.c
+1 -1
@@ -561,8 +561,8 @@ void wt_status_print(struct wt_status *s)
561 color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, color(WT_STATUS_HEADER, s), "#");
562 }
563
564 - wt_status_print_unmerged(s);
564 wt_status_print_updated(s);
565 + wt_status_print_unmerged(s);
566 wt_status_print_changed(s);
567 if (s->submodule_summary)
568 wt_status_print_submodule_summary(s);