files-backend: prefer "0" for write_in_full() error check

Commit 06f46f237a (avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) != len" pattern, 2017-09-13) converted this callsite from: write_in_full(...) != 1 to write_in_full(...) < 0 But during the conflict resolution in c50424a6f0 (Merge branch 'jk/write-in-full-fix', 2017-09-25), this morphed into write_in_full(...) < 1 This behaves as we want, but we prefer to avoid modeling the "less than length" error-check which can be subtly buggy, as shown in efacf609c8 (config: avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) < len" pattern, 2017-09-13). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Jeff King committed Sep 25, 2017 at 16:27 UTC 88780c37b314d783db09118179ceba30096ef935
1 file changed +1 -1
refs/files-backend.c
+1 -1
@@ -3007,7 +3007,7 @@ static int files_reflog_expire(struct ref_store *ref_store,
3007 } else if (update &&
3008 (write_in_full(get_lock_file_fd(&lock->lk),
3009 oid_to_hex(&cb.last_kept_oid), GIT_SHA1_HEXSZ) < 0 ||
3010 - write_str_in_full(get_lock_file_fd(&lock->lk), "\n") < 1 ||
3010 + write_str_in_full(get_lock_file_fd(&lock->lk), "\n") < 0 ||
3011 close_ref_gently(lock) < 0)) {
3012 status |= error("couldn't write %s",
3013 get_lock_file_path(&lock->lk));