multi-pack-index: refactor "goto usage" pattern

Refactor the "goto usage" pattern added in cd57bc41bbc (builtin/multi-pack-index.c: display usage on unrecognized command, 2021-03-30) and 88617d11f9d (multi-pack-index: fix potential segfault without sub-command, 2021-07-19) to maintain the same brevity, but in a form that doesn't run afoul of the recommendation in CodingGuidelines about braces: When there are multiple arms to a conditional and some of them require braces, enclose even a single line block in braces for consistency[...] Let's also change "argv == 0" to juts "!argv", per: Do not explicitly compare an integral value with constant 0 or '\0', or a pointer value with constant NULL[...] I'm changing this because in a subsequent commit I'll make builtin/commit-graph.c use the same pattern, having the two similarly structured commands match aids readability. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason committed Aug 23, 2021 at 14:30 UTC 92f480909f774ca65a2c6fb174fe5052169b5b63
1 file changed +5 -6
builtin/multi-pack-index.c
+5 -6
index 8ff0dee2ec..649aa5f9ab 100644 --- a/builtin/multi-pack-index.c +++ b/builtin/multi-pack-index.c @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ int cmd_multi_pack_index(int argc, const char **argv, if (!opts.object_dir) opts.object_dir = get_object_directory(); - if (argc == 0) + if (!argc) goto usage; if (!strcmp(argv[0], "repack")) @@ -175,10 +175,9 @@ int cmd_multi_pack_index(int argc, const char **argv, return cmd_multi_pack_index_verify(argc, argv); else if (!strcmp(argv[0], "expire")) return cmd_multi_pack_index_expire(argc, argv); - else { - error(_("unrecognized subcommand: %s"), argv[0]); + + error(_("unrecognized subcommand: %s"), argv[0]); usage: - usage_with_options(builtin_multi_pack_index_usage, - builtin_multi_pack_index_options); - } + usage_with_options(builtin_multi_pack_index_usage, + builtin_multi_pack_index_options); }