@matheusbsbs / matheus-bagliano / commits / 993d7085be

t3060: fix mention of function prune_index

Commit [1] added tests which trigger function prune_cache. The comments in these tests, however, incorrectly call it "prune_path". Since then, function "prune_cache" has been renamed to "prune_index" in commit [2]. Later still in commit [3], the_index singleton, which is also mentioned in a comment, stopped being used directly with function "prune_index". Fix mentions of function "prune_index" and the struct it changes in comments in file "t3060-ls-files-with-tree.sh". [1] 54e1abce90 (Add test case for ls-files --with-tree, 2007-10-03) [2] 6510ae173a (ls-files: convert prune_cache to take an index, 2017-06-12) [3] 188dce131f (ls-files: use repository object, 2017-06-22) Signed-off-by: Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Andrei Rybak committed Mar 31, 2023 at 16:36 UTC 993d7085be2bf79b4d1fe2b0c017b380e796c21c
1 file changed +2 -2
t/t3060-ls-files-with-tree.sh
+2 -2
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' '
40 git commit -a -m "remove them all" &&
41
42 # The bug also requires some entry before our directory so that
43 - # prune_path will modify the_index.cache
43 + # prune_index will modify the_repository->index.cache
44
45 mkdir a_directory_that_sorts_before_sub &&
46 >a_directory_that_sorts_before_sub/file &&
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ test_expect_success 'usage' '
56 '
57
58 test_expect_success 'git ls-files --with-tree should succeed from subdir' '
59 - # We have to run from a sub-directory to trigger prune_path
59 + # We have to run from a sub-directory to trigger prune_index
60 # Then we finally get to run our --with-tree test
61 (
62 cd sub &&