reftable/writer: use correct type to iterate through index entries
The reftable writer is tracking the number of blocks it has to index via the `index_len` variable. But while this variable is of type `size_t`, some sites use an `int` to loop through the index entries. Convert the code to consistently use `size_t`. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Patrick Steinhardt committed
Feb 1, 2024 at 08:52 UTC
9ebb2d7b08c9f17a846b7c90082c9d15b9f6c9d2
1 file changed
+7
-9
reftable/writer.c
+7
-9
index 92935baa70..5a0b87b406 100644
--- a/reftable/writer.c
+++ b/reftable/writer.c
@@ -379,20 +379,21 @@ int reftable_writer_add_logs(struct reftable_writer *w,
static int writer_finish_section(struct reftable_writer *w)
{
+ struct reftable_block_stats *bstats = NULL;
uint8_t typ = block_writer_type(w->block_writer);
uint64_t index_start = 0;
int max_level = 0;
- int threshold = w->opts.unpadded ? 1 : 3;
+ size_t threshold = w->opts.unpadded ? 1 : 3;
int before_blocks = w->stats.idx_stats.blocks;
- int err = writer_flush_block(w);
- int i = 0;
- struct reftable_block_stats *bstats = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ err = writer_flush_block(w);
if (err < 0)
return err;
while (w->index_len > threshold) {
struct reftable_index_record *idx = NULL;
- int idx_len = 0;
+ size_t i, idx_len;
max_level++;
index_start = w->next;
@@ -630,11 +631,8 @@ done:
static void writer_clear_index(struct reftable_writer *w)
{
- int i = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < w->index_len; i++) {
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < w->index_len; i++)
strbuf_release(&w->index[i].last_key);
- }
-
FREE_AND_NULL(w->index);
w->index_len = 0;
w->index_cap = 0;