name-rev: make dedicated --annotate-stdin --name-only test
The previous commit split the `--name-only` handling: 1. `--annotate-stdin`: uses the new `struct command` 2. The rest: uses `struct name_ref_data` But there is no dedicated test for the option combination in (1). That means that the following tests will fail if you neglect to set `command.u.name_only` properly: name-rev --annotate-stdin works with commitGraph name-rev --annotate-stdin works with non-monotonic timestamps even though it has nothing to do with what these tests are supposed to test. Let’s add another regression test now that it is relevant. Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Kristoffer Haugsbakk committed
May 11, 2026 at 17:45 UTC
ae34adcf035b0b9bed705727e8884082ff4ae7aa
1 file changed
+14
t/t6120-describe.sh
+14
@@ -298,6 +298,20 @@ test_expect_success 'name-rev --annotate-stdin' '
298
test_cmp expect actual
299
'
300
301
+test_expect_success 'name-rev --annotate-stdin --name-only' '
302
+ >expect.unsorted &&
303
+ for rev in $(git rev-list --all)
304
+ do
305
+ name=$(git name-rev --name-only $rev) &&
306
+ echo "$name" >>expect.unsorted || return 1
307
+ done &&
308
+ sort <expect.unsorted >expect &&
309
+ git name-rev --annotate-stdin --name-only \
310
+ <list >actual.unsorted &&
311
+ sort <actual.unsorted >actual &&
312
+ test_cmp expect actual
313
+'
314
+
315
test_expect_success 'name-rev --stdin deprecated' '
316
git rev-list --all >list &&
317
if ! test_have_prereq WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES