receive-pack: fix misleading namespace/.have comment
The comment claims that we handle alternate ".have" lines through this function, but that hasn't been the case since 85f251045 (write_head_info(): handle "extra refs" locally, 2012-01-06). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King committed
Feb 8, 2017 at 15:53 UTC
fea6c47f2f106c3617eaf52f973a1a07629ebf46
1 file changed
+1
-4
builtin/receive-pack.c
+1
-4
@@ -261,10 +261,7 @@ static int show_ref_cb(const char *path_full, const struct object_id *oid,
261
/*
262
* Advertise refs outside our current namespace as ".have"
263
* refs, so that the client can use them to minimize data
264
- * transfer but will otherwise ignore them. This happens to
265
- * cover ".have" that are thrown in by add_one_alternate_ref()
266
- * to mark histories that are complete in our alternates as
267
- * well.
264
+ * transfer but will otherwise ignore them.
265
*/
266
if (!path)
267
path = ".have";