additional comparison with hfs2
Massimo Melina committed
Dec 29, 2022 at 17:43 UTC
b7d77b4393cb9a4c85dce4954092444759e25eb3
1 file changed
+1
README.md
+1
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ Other than that, you can also consider:
83
84
- it's more robust: it was designed to be an always-running server, while HFS 1-2 was designed for occasional usage (transfer and quit)
85
- passwords are never really stored, just a non-reversible hash is
86
+- faster search (up to 12x)
87
- more flexible permissions
88
89
But you may still want to stay with HFS 2.x (so far) for the following reasons