ci(winget): drop internal account mapping from public workflow comment
The token-split comment spelled out which GitHub account authors the issue vs. the PR in each repo. These are public repos; keep the comment to the role-based mechanics (WINGET_ISSUE_TOKEN / WINGET_PR_TOKEN) and drop the account names and cross-repo mapping. Co-Authored-By: siGit Code v1.6.7-acp <noreply@sigit.si>
keypair34 committed
Oct 12, 2026 at 14:12 UTC
c5d423515a911ef16f1e39d1d9bef9e6a71a82b1
1 file changed
+5
-12
.github/workflows/release-winget.yml
+5
-12
@@ -131,18 +131,11 @@ jobs:
131
# "please provide the installer link"). A free-text body lands as
132
# Needs-Triage and can't be acted on.
133
#
134
- # The issue and the PR are deliberately authored by *two different*
135
- # GitHub accounts, because the author is decided by which PAT creates
136
- # each one. The role-to-account mapping lives in the repo secrets, not
137
- # here, so this YAML is identical in getsigit/sigit and smbcloud-cli;
138
- # only the secret values are swapped:
139
- #
140
- # repo WINGET_ISSUE_TOKEN WINGET_PR_TOKEN
141
- # getsigit/sigit setoelkahfi paydii
142
- # smbcloudXYZ/... paydii setoelkahfi
143
- #
144
- # Both PATs need public_repo scope on microsoft/winget-pkgs (fork + open
145
- # issues/PRs). WINGET_PR_TOKEN replaces the old single WINGET_TOKEN.
134
+ # The issue and the PR are authored by two separate PATs, configured as
135
+ # the repo secrets WINGET_ISSUE_TOKEN (the Package Request issue) and
136
+ # WINGET_PR_TOKEN (the manifest PR). Both need public_repo scope on
137
+ # microsoft/winget-pkgs (fork + open issues/PRs). WINGET_PR_TOKEN
138
+ # replaces the old single WINGET_TOKEN.
139
- name: File the winget Package Request issue
140
id: issue
141
shell: bash