| 1 | name: "Netdata Agent: Feature request" |
| 2 | description: "Submit a feature request and help us improve our free and open-source Netdata Agent" |
| 3 | title: "[Feat]: " |
| 4 | labels: ["feature request", "needs triage"] |
| 5 | type: "feature" |
| 6 | body: |
| 7 | - type: markdown |
| 8 | attributes: |
| 9 | value: "### Thank you for contributing to our project!" |
| 10 | - type: markdown |
| 11 | attributes: |
| 12 | value: | |
| 13 | Submit a feature request and help us improve our free and open-source Netdata Agent. |
| 14 | - type: textarea |
| 15 | id: problem |
| 16 | attributes: |
| 17 | label: Problem |
| 18 | description: | |
| 19 | Is your feature request intended to solve a problem? If so, provide a description of the problem. |
| 20 | validations: |
| 21 | required: false |
| 22 | - type: textarea |
| 23 | id: description |
| 24 | attributes: |
| 25 | label: Description |
| 26 | description: | |
| 27 | Provide a clear and concise description of the feature you want or need. |
| 28 | validations: |
| 29 | required: true |
| 30 | - type: dropdown |
| 31 | id: importance |
| 32 | attributes: |
| 33 | label: Importance |
| 34 | description: | |
| 35 | Help us to understand the importance of your feature request. Choose "blocker" if lack of this feature stops you from using Netdata Agent. |
| 36 | options: |
| 37 | - "nice to have" |
| 38 | - "really want" |
| 39 | - "must have" |
| 40 | - "blocker" |
| 41 | validations: |
| 42 | required: true |
| 43 | - type: textarea |
| 44 | id: value-proposition |
| 45 | attributes: |
| 46 | label: Value proposition |
| 47 | description: | |
| 48 | Help us to understand why we need this feaure. Describe benefits that users receive if we implement this feature request. |
| 49 | value: | |
| 50 | 1. |
| 51 | 2. |
| 52 | 3. |
| 53 | ... |
| 54 | validations: |
| 55 | required: true |
| 56 | - type: textarea |
| 57 | id: proposed-implementation |
| 58 | attributes: |
| 59 | label: Proposed implementation |
| 60 | description: | |
| 61 | Share your proposal if you have any ideas on how this feature can be implemented. |
| 62 | validations: |
| 63 | required: false |