worktree: give "should be pruned?" function more meaningful name
Readers of the name prune_worktree() are likely to expect the function to actually prune a worktree, however, it only answers the question "should this worktree be pruned?". Give it a name more reflective of its true purpose to avoid such confusion. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Eric Sunshine committed
Jun 10, 2020 at 02:30 UTC
1b14d40b385580a366c92f8c2a9373e6fd7cb26f
1 file changed
+2
-2
builtin/worktree.c
+2
-2
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void delete_worktrees_dir_if_empty(void)
67
rmdir(git_path("worktrees")); /* ignore failed removal */
68
}
69
70
-static int prune_worktree(const char *id, struct strbuf *reason)
70
+static int should_prune_worktree(const char *id, struct strbuf *reason)
71
{
72
struct stat st;
73
char *path;
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void prune_worktrees(void)
144
if (is_dot_or_dotdot(d->d_name))
145
continue;
146
strbuf_reset(&reason);
147
- if (!prune_worktree(d->d_name, &reason))
147
+ if (!should_prune_worktree(d->d_name, &reason))
148
continue;
149
if (show_only || verbose)
150
printf_ln(_("Removing %s/%s: %s"),