reftable: fix resource warning
This would trigger in the unlikely event that we are compacting, and the next available file handle is 0. Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Han-Wen Nienhuys committed
Jan 20, 2022 at 15:12 UTC
b20aab501788a076b7118946afac4a460bf19d68
1 file changed
+5
-5
reftable/stack.c
+5
-5
index df5021ebf0..018d8c4ee6 100644
--- a/reftable/stack.c
+++ b/reftable/stack.c
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int stack_compact_range(struct reftable_stack *st, int first, int last,
struct strbuf new_table_path = STRBUF_INIT;
int err = 0;
int have_lock = 0;
- int lock_file_fd = 0;
+ int lock_file_fd = -1;
int compact_count = last - first + 1;
char **listp = NULL;
char **delete_on_success =
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static int stack_compact_range(struct reftable_stack *st, int first, int last,
}
/* Don't want to write to the lock for now. */
close(lock_file_fd);
- lock_file_fd = 0;
+ lock_file_fd = -1;
have_lock = 1;
err = stack_uptodate(st);
@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ static int stack_compact_range(struct reftable_stack *st, int first, int last,
goto done;
}
err = close(lock_file_fd);
- lock_file_fd = 0;
+ lock_file_fd = -1;
if (err < 0) {
err = REFTABLE_IO_ERROR;
unlink(new_table_path.buf);
@@ -1050,9 +1050,9 @@ done:
listp++;
}
free_names(subtable_locks);
- if (lock_file_fd > 0) {
+ if (lock_file_fd >= 0) {
close(lock_file_fd);
- lock_file_fd = 0;
+ lock_file_fd = -1;
}
if (have_lock) {
unlink(lock_file_name.buf);