Remove `isStatic`

This can be replicated with a custom component that always returns false` from `shouldComponentUpdate`. A generic implementation might look like: ``` var StaticContainer = React.createClass({ shouldComponentUpdate: function() { return false; }, render: function() { return this.transferPropsTo(this.props.children[0]); } }); ``` And then used in JSX as `<StaticContainer><div>Hello!</div></StaticContainer>`, resulting in only `<div>Hello!</div>` being inserted into the DOM.

CommitSyncScript committed Jun 13, 2013 at 16:33 UTC f456f8fa8d833016e4846e41d04b28cafff7a4a5

2 files changed +2 -5

src/core/ReactCompositeComponent.js

+1 -3

@@ -679,9 +679,7 @@ var ReactCompositeComponentMixin = {

679 var currentComponent = this._renderedComponent;

680 var nextComponent = this._renderValidatedComponent();

681 if (currentComponent.constructor === nextComponent.constructor) {

682 - if (!nextComponent.props.isStatic) {

683 - currentComponent.receiveProps(nextComponent.props, transaction);

684 - }

682 + currentComponent.receiveProps(nextComponent.props, transaction);

683 } else {

684 // These two IDs are actually the same! But nothing should rely on that.

685 var thisID = this._rootNodeID;

src/core/ReactMultiChild.js

+1 -2

@@ -167,8 +167,7 @@ var ReactMultiChildMixin = {

167 this.enqueueMove(curChild._domIndex, loopDomIndex);

168 }

169 curChildrenDOMIndex = Math.max(curChild._domIndex, curChildrenDOMIndex);

170 - !nextChild.props.isStatic &&

171 - curChild.receiveProps(nextChild.props, transaction);

170 + curChild.receiveProps(nextChild.props, transaction);

171 curChild._domIndex = loopDomIndex;

172 } else {

173 if (curChild) { // !shouldUpdate && curChild => delete