name: sigit-code-release

#description: Prepare and verify siGit Code releases. Use when bumping versions, checking Cargo, npm, or PyPI package metadata, validating release notes, confirming CI readiness, or assembling a release checklist for a new siGit Code version.

#siGit Code Release

Use this skill when preparing a release for this repository.

#Focus areas

• Keep the branded product name as siGit Code in prose and sigit for commands, crate names, repo paths, and package identifiers.
• Verify version consistency across release surfaces, but respect which files are real sources of truth versus generated or release-time rewritten artifacts.
• Check release-facing docs such as README.md, CHANGELOG.md, workflow notes, and package metadata for stale version references or incorrect naming.
• Validate the local release path pragmatically: formatting, linting, targeted tests, and any repo-specific release checks that matter for the requested version.

#Working approach

1. Read the files that define the release version and distribution metadata before proposing any changes.
2. Treat Cargo.toml as the primary release version source for the Rust crate and the PyPI package in this repository.
3. Check how the release workflows rewrite or derive versions before editing checked-in npm or Python metadata.
4. Prefer targeted verification commands that match CI or packaging workflows already present in the repository.
5. Report blockers clearly: failed checks, version mismatches, missing changelog entries, or unpublished packaging changes.

#Repo-specific release rules

• Bump the crate version in Cargo.toml.
• Update the root sigit package entry in Cargo.lock when the crate version changes.
• Add or update the top changelog entry in CHANGELOG.md for the release being cut.
• Do not treat npm/sigit/package.json 0.0.0-dev as a bug by default. The npm release workflow rewrites it at publish time using npm/scripts/render-main-package.cjs and the release tag.
• Every npm package publishes twice, under @getsigit and under @smbcloud. @smbcloud is the pre-1.5.5 name, mirrored so an install predating the rename keeps updating; @getsigit is canonical and is what the README, the Homebrew tap, and the ACP registry entry point at. All fourteen names (two base packages, twelve platform packages) publish over OIDC and each needs its own Trusted Publisher on npm pointing at release-npm.yml.
• The scope is a render-time argument, not a second copy of the packaging: render-platform-package.cjs takes it as a fifth argument, and the base package picks it up from package-main.json.tmpl versus package-compat.json.tmpl. npm/sigit/src/index.ts is built once and shipped under both names — it reads its own package.json at runtime to decide which scope to resolve the platform binary from, and prints the migration notice only when it finds itself running as @smbcloud/sigit.
• Do not add a hardcoded version to pypi/pyproject.toml for normal releases. PyPI uses maturin with dynamic = ["version"] and derives the published package version from Cargo.toml.
• Release workflows are tag-driven. release-github.yml, release-npm.yml, release-pypi.yml, release-crates.yml, release-homebrew.yml, release-nuget.yml, and release-mcp-registry.yml all derive RELEASE_VERSION from a v*.*.* tag or a manually supplied tag input.
• The crate is published to crates.io (release-crates.yml) and the Homebrew tap is updated (release-homebrew.yml) as part of the tag-driven flow. Per the siGit release flow, Homebrew is auto-triggered — do not dispatch it manually.
• release-github.yml builds the binaries, attaches them (plus a .deb/.rpm per Linux target built with nfpm from packaging/nfpm.yaml) to the GitHub release, then dispatches release-homebrew, release-scoop, release-winget, and release-aur. A dispatch failure in any one of those four is logged as a warning, not a hard failure — an unconfigured channel doesn't block the rest of the release. release-nuget.yml and release-mcp-registry.yml, by contrast, are tag-triggered directly like the other language-registry workflows, not dispatched from release-github.yml.
• Every release asset carries a .sha256 sidecar (not just the macOS Homebrew tarball). Scoop, winget, and the AUR PKGBUILD each consume the raw binaries plus their sidecar checksum, rather than the tarball.
• The GitHub release body is generated, not hand-written: release-github.yml's release job checks out the tag, awk-extracts the ## <version> section from CHANGELOG.md (a missing section is a hard failure), appends a full-changelog link and a sigit.si/code footnote, and publishes it via body_path: release_notes.md. The only file a release-prep change needs to touch is CHANGELOG.md — never edit release notes in the GitHub UI, because the next tag push would overwrite them.
• npm and NuGet publish via OIDC trusted publishing — neither has a stored token in the repo. On npm this is configured per package (each @getsigit/* name has a trusted publisher pointing at release-npm.yml), so a new package needs the same setup before its first publish will work. OIDC requires npm >= 11.5.1 and Node >= 22.14.0.
• The NuGet package (SiGit.Code, dotnet tool install --global SiGit.Code) bundles all six platform binaries under native/<os>-<arch>/ behind a managed shim, rather than shipping one package per platform like npm/PyPI. Watch the nuget.org 250 MB package-size limit if it ever grows.
• The winget channel (release-winget.yml) files a Package Request issue first and then opens the manifest PR that resolves it, authored by two separate classic PATs (not fine-grained) — WINGET_ISSUE_TOKEN for the issue and WINGET_PR_TOKEN for the PR, replacing the old single WINGET_TOKEN. WINGET_ISSUE_TOKEN needs public_repo. WINGET_PR_TOKEN needs public_repo plus read:org and read:discussion: wingetcreate forks microsoft/winget-pkgs and opens the PR (fork needs public_repo; a fine-grained PAT scoped to getsigit/sigit can't fork an outside repo and 403/404s), and the "Set the winget PR body" step then runs gh pr edit, whose GraphQL query resolves org/team and discussion fields and fails with a scope error on a public_repo-only token (CI run 38262301933). The PR token is passed as WINGET_CREATE_GITHUB_TOKEN (not --token) so it doesn't leak into logs. wingetcreate update only works on a package that already exists in microsoft/winget-pkgs, so the workflow checks manifests/g/getSigit/siGitCode first and falls back to wingetcreate submit with packaging/winget/*.yaml.in for the first release; every later release takes the update path. If a winget release fails on the fork step, check the token type; if it fails on the gh pr edit step with a scope error, check WINGET_PR_TOKEN's scopes before re-dispatching.
• The baked-in official MCP server is separately listed in the public MCP Registry as si.sigit/sigit (release-mcp-registry.yml, driven by server.json at the repo root). It's a remote Streamable-HTTP listing, so it's verified by a DNS TXT record on the sigit.si domain rather than the GitHub-OIDC scheme used for package listings.

#Git release flow

Releases are shipped on main, and the published tags (v1.2.0, v1.2.1) point at the main-side merge commit, never at a release branch or at development. There are two flows, and picking the wrong one ships the wrong set of commits. Decide first which this is.

#Full release (minor/major — ships everything on development)

Cut from development when the release is meant to carry all the work that has accumulated there.

1. Branch release/v<version> off development.
2. Apply the version bump and changelog edits, then commit (e.g. Release v<version>).
3. Merge release/v<version> back into development.
4. Merge development into main (commit message: Merge development into main for v<version> release).
5. Tag v<version> on that main merge commit, then push main and the tag.

For a full release, step 4 is the only way commits are meant to reach main. A feature or fix PR targeting main breaks that: it puts work on the release branch that development does not have, so the next release is cut without it. Such PRs belong on development (see the pull request target rule in AGENTS.md).

#Scoped patch (hotfix — ships only specific fixes on top of the last tag)

Use this when the patch must ship only a named set of fixes on top of the last released tag, not the unreleased work sitting on development (e.g. a patch over v1.6.7 that must carry just a winget/Windows hotfix while ACP features stay unreleased). The giveaway is wording like "scoped patch off v<prev>" or "hotfix" — if development is far ahead, a development → main merge would drag all of it out under a patch tag, which is wrong.

1. Branch release/v<version> off the last released tag (v<prev>), not development.
2. Cherry-pick (or commit) only the in-scope fixes, then the version bump + changelog, and commit (e.g. Release v<version>).
3. Merge release/v<version> back into development so the bump and changelog carry forward.
4. Merge release/v<version> directly into main (commit message: Release v<version>) — never development → main for a scoped patch, since that would pull development's unreleased work onto main.
5. Tag v<version> on that main merge commit, then push main and the tag.

Before tagging a scoped patch, audit the scope: git log --oneline v<prev>^{commit}..main and git diff --stat v<prev>^{commit}..main must show only the intended fixes and the release metadata files (Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock, CHANGELOG.md), nothing from development.

Pushing the v*.*.* tag is what fires every release workflow, so create and push it only after the merge into main has landed. Do not commit, tag, or push until the user explicitly asks — confirm the version and that they want the release to go out first.

Decide up front which flow you are in and confirm the exact scope with the user. If in doubt about whether a release ships everything on development or only a scoped set of fixes, ask — the two flows start from different base commits and are not interchangeable.

#Typical files to inspect

• Cargo.toml
• Cargo.lock
• CHANGELOG.md
• README.md
• npm/sigit/package.json
• npm/package-main.json.tmpl, npm/package-compat.json.tmpl, npm/package.json.tmpl (publish-time package metadata for both scopes)
• npm/scripts/render-main-package.cjs
• npm/
• pypi/
• nuget/sigit/ (bundled-binary .NET tool packaging)
• packaging/ (nfpm.yaml for .deb/.rpm, plus aur/ and winget/ templates)
• server.json (MCP Registry listing)
• .github/workflows/ (release-github.yml, release-npm.yml, release-pypi.yml, release-crates.yml, release-homebrew.yml, release-scoop.yml, release-winget.yml, release-aur.yml, release-nuget.yml, release-mcp-registry.yml)

#Release checklist

• Version bump is applied everywhere it needs to be.
• Cargo.toml and the root crate entry in Cargo.lock match.
• CHANGELOG.md has a correct top entry for the new release.
• npm/sigit/package.json is left at 0.0.0-dev unless the packaging flow itself changed.
• pypi/pyproject.toml still uses dynamic versioning unless there is a deliberate packaging change.
• Release workflows still derive their version from the tag as expected.
• Correct git flow for the release type followed, with v<version> tagged on the main merge commit either way:
  • Full release: bump committed on release/v<version> (off development), merged back to development, then development merged into main.
  • Scoped patch: release/v<version> branched off the last tag v<prev>, in-scope fixes + bump committed, merged back to development, then release/v<version> merged directly into main (never development → main), and the scope audited (git log --oneline v<prev>^{commit}..main / git diff --stat v<prev>^{commit}..main) to show only the intended fixes plus release metadata.
• Release notes or changelog entries match the actual changes.
• CI-equivalent local checks pass for the relevant platform or target.
• Package names, install commands, and branding stay consistent across npm, PyPI, crates.io, Homebrew, NuGet, Scoop, winget, AUR, and the .deb/.rpm packages.
• Every release asset (including the new .deb/.rpm/raw binaries consumed by Scoop, winget, and AUR) has a matching .sha256 sidecar.
• Any known release limitations are called out explicitly, including a dispatch failure in release-scoop/release-winget/release-aur (non-fatal — logged as a warning by release-github.yml) versus a hard failure in a directly tag-triggered workflow like release-nuget or release-mcp-registry.
• The winget channel uses two classic PATs (not fine-grained): WINGET_ISSUE_TOKEN (public_repo) for the Package Request issue and WINGET_PR_TOKEN (public_repo + read:org + read:discussion) for the manifest PR, so wingetcreate can fork microsoft/winget-pkgs and gh pr edit can set the PR body. If a winget release fails on the fork step, verify the token type; if it fails on the gh pr edit step, verify WINGET_PR_TOKEN's scopes before re-dispatching.